MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SIBULU UNTUK PENINGKATAN KEAKTIFAN DAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA PADA MATERI EKOSISTEM
Keywords:
Model Pembelajaran SIBULU, Keaktifan Siswa, Pemahaman Konsep, EkosistemAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi Model Pembelajaran SIBULU dalam meningkatkan keaktifan serta pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi ekosistem melalui pendekatan kajian literatur. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah rendahnya keterlibatan siswa dan kesenjangan antara konsep ekosistem yang diajarkan dengan konteks kehidupan nyata, serta masih kuatnya miskonsepsi. Ini menuntut model pembelajaran yang mampu menghadirkan pengalaman belajar aktif, kontekstual, dan mendorong konstruksi pengetahuan secara mandiri. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka terhadap penelitian nasional dan internasional tahun 2020–2025 yang relevan dengan model pembelajaran inovatif, pembelajaran aktif, keaktifan siswa, dan pemahaman konsep pada topik ekosistem. Hasil sintesis literatur menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran yang menempatkan siswa sebagai pusat aktivitas melalui eksplorasi, diskusi, dan pemecahan masalah terbukti efektif meningkatkan keterlibatan kognitif, emosional, dan perilaku siswa. Pendekatan pembelajaran aktif ini juga membantu mengatasi miskonsepsi sekaligus memperkuat pemahaman konsep yang bersifat sistemik dan aplikatif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa Model Pembelajaran SIBULU memiliki dasar teoritis yang kuat untuk diterapkan sebagai strategi dalam meningkatkan keaktifan dan pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi ekosistem.
Downloads
References
Amanda, FF, Sumitro, SB, Lestari, SR & Ibrohim, I 2023, ‘Enhancing critical thinking and problem solving skills by complexity science-problem based learning model’, Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, vol. 1, doi:10.17583/remie.9409.
Aprillia, MP & Iryanti, SS 2024, ‘Revitalisasi pendidikan Islam di era digital: Membangun keseimbangan antara tradisi dan inovasi’, Al-Muaddib Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 25, doi:10.46773/muaddib.v6i1.1111.
Baidoo-Anu, D & Ansah, LO 2023, ‘Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning’, Journal of AI, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 52, doi:10.61969/jai.1337500.
Bleier, M 2023, ‘Beyond neat classifications: A case for the in-betweens’, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 483, doi:10.1007/s11422-023-10184-1.
Chigbu, UE, Atiku, SO & Plessis, CCD 2023, ‘The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising’, Publications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2, doi:10.3390/publications11010002.
Cooper, MM et al. 2024, ‘Beyond active learning: Using 3-dimensional learning to create scientifically authentic, student-centered classrooms’, PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 5, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295887.
Dzaiy, AHS & Abdullah, SA 2024, ‘The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions’, Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, vol. 28, no. 4, doi:10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18.
Freeman, S et al. 2014, ‘Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, p. 8410, doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Guerra-Reyes, F et al. 2024, ‘Misconceptions in the learning of natural sciences: A systematic review’, Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 497, doi:10.3390/educsci14050497.
Hadi, NF & Afandi, NK 2021, ‘Literature review is a part of research’, Sultra Educational Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 64, doi:10.54297/seduj.v1i3.203.
Hao, L, Cui, Y & Zhou, W 2018, ‘Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis’, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 517, doi:10.2224/sbp.7054.
Holley, D & Park, S 2020, ‘Integration of science disciplinary core ideas and environmental themes through constructivist teaching practices’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 5, doi:10.29333/ejmste/115583.
Isnayanti, AN, Putriwanti, P, Kasmawati, K & Rahmita, R 2025, ‘Integrasi pembelajaran mendalam (deep learning) dalam kurikulum sekolah dasar: Tantangan dan peluang’, Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 911, doi:10.30605/cjpe.8.2.2025.6027.
Ješková, Z et al. 2022, ‘Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills’, Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 686, doi:10.3390/educsci12100686.
Lagubeau, G, Tecpan, S & Hernández, C 2020, ‘Active learning reduces academic risk of students with nonformal reasoning skills: Evidence from an introductory physics massive course in a Chilean public university’, Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 16, no. 2, doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.023101.
Lavi, R & Bertel, LB 2024, ‘Active learning pedagogies in high school and undergraduate STEM education’, Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1011, doi:10.3390/educsci14091011.
Lombardi, D et al. 2021, ‘The curious construct of active learning’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 8, doi:10.1177/1529100620973974.
Mambrey, S, Schreiber, N & Schmiemann, P 2020, ‘Young students’ reasoning about ecosystems: The role of systems thinking, knowledge, conceptions, and representation’, Research in Science Education, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 79, doi:10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x.
Olimpo, JT & Esparza, D 2020, Active learning and conceptual understanding in biology, p. 43, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_4.
Peñafiel, JJR & Inga, E 2023, ‘Interactive peer instruction method applied to classroom environments considering a learning engineering approach to innovate the teaching–learning process’, Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 301, doi:10.3390/educsci13030301.
Ramchunder, SJ & Ziegler, AD 2021, ‘Promoting sustainability education through hands-on approaches: A tree carbon sequestration exercise in a Singapore green space’, Sustainability Science, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1045, doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00897-5.
Rodgers, VL et al. 2024, ‘Four-dimensional ecology education (4DEE) for everyone: Teaching ecology to non-majors’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 22, no. 6, doi:10.1002/fee.2749.
Sperber, CF et al. 2020, ‘Effectiveness of active learning for ecology teaching: The perspective of students vs their grades’, bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/2020.04.02.021584.
Spiegelaar, N 2023, ‘Sustainability pedagogy: Understanding, exploring and internalizing nature’s complexity and coherence’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922275.
Supriyanto, E 2021, ‘Strategi penerapan kebijakan sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) di Indonesia: Studi literatur dan studi komparatif Oman’, Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 10, doi:10.33474/jisop.v3i1.6959.
Utami, AB & Widiyaningrum, P 2020, ‘The effectiveness of school environment-based inquiry model in the ecosystem material towards critical thinking ability and environmental caring attitudes of high school students’, Journal of Biology Education, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 367, doi:10.15294/jbe.v8i3.31660.
Wong, M, Al-Arnawoot, A & Hass, K 2022, ‘Student perception of a visual novel for fostering science process skills’, Teaching & Learning Inquiry, vol. 10, doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.32.
Yannier, N et al. 2021, ‘Active learning: “Hands-on” meets “minds-on”’, Science, vol. 374, no. 6563, p. 26, doi:10.1126/science.abj9957.
Yusuf, YS & Ali, N 2025, ‘Strategi pembelajaran integratif di pesantren dengan menggabungkan tradisi dan modernitas’, Journal of Islamic Education Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 173, doi:10.58569/jies.v3i2.1164.
Zahra, A, Waheed, Z, Fatima, T & Khong, KW 2024, ‘Leveraging technology for environmental awareness: Insights from experimental research with middle school students in Malaysia’, RMLE Online, vol. 47, no. 4, p. 1, doi:10.1080/19404476.2024.2322046.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rifqatul Wafiah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
