PERAN MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK DI ERA DIGITAL: STUDI KASUS PERINGATAN DARURAT DI MEDIA SOSIAL
Keywords:
Media Sosial, Kebijakan Publik, Partisipasi Reaktif, Simbolisasi Visual, Demokrasi DigitalAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran media sosial dalam pembentukan kebijakan publik dengan mengambil kasus gerakan "Peringatan Darurat" yang menggunakan simbol Garuda berlatar belakang biru di Indonesia. Media sosial kini menjadi alat partisipasi publik yang penting dalam konteks politik kontemporer, khususnya dalam merespons kebijakan yang dianggap kontroversial oleh masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan paradigma konstruktivistik dengan pendekatan kualitatif serta metode studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan informan yang dipilih secara purposif, observasi digital, dan analisis dokumentasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis tematik, sementara validitas dan reliabilitas data diuji dengan triangulasi sumber dan metode. Penelitian menemukan bahwa media sosial berperan signifikan dalam mobilisasi partisipasi publik melalui simbol visual yang kuat, seperti Garuda biru. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam gerakan ini berhasil menciptakan tekanan politik yang nyata terhadap kebijakan pemerintah dan DPR, serta menghasilkan perubahan sikap politik pada beberapa politisi dan partai politik. Temuan ini mendukung teori tangga partisipasi publik oleh Arnstein, ruang publik digital Habermas, dan semiotika politik Barthes, yang menegaskan bahwa media sosial telah berkembang menjadi ruang demokrasi alternatif yang efektif dalam mempengaruhi kebijakan publik. Simbol visual memainkan peran penting dalam memobilisasi opini publik dan memperkuat partisipasi politik reaktif. Media sosial terbukti sebagai alat demokrasi yang signifikan dalam konteks pembentukan kebijakan publik di Indonesia. Partisipasi reaktif masyarakat, simbolisasi visual yang kuat, dan tekanan publik yang masif melalui media digital secara nyata mampu mempengaruhi proses kebijakan publik.
Downloads
References
Alkhatib, A. and Bernstein, M. (2019) ‘Street-Level Algorithms: A Theory at the Gaps Between Policy and Decisions’, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300760
Binns, R. (2018) ‘Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy’, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, pp. 1–11.
Bovens, M. and Zouridis, S. (2002) ‘From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracy: How ICT is Transforming Administrative Discretion’, Public Administration Review, 62(2), pp. 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00168
Busch, P.A. and Henriksen, H.Z. (2022) ‘Digital Discretion: A Systematic Literature Review of ICT and Street-Level Discretion’, Information Polity, 27(1), pp. 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200300
Eubanks, V. (2018) ‘Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor’, St. Martin’s Press.
Guenduez, A.A. and Mergel, I. (2024) ‘Algorithms in the Public Sector: A Review of Discretion and Administrative Values’, Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101894
Hadwick, A. and Lan, L. (2024) ‘Algorithmic Accountability and the Social Contract’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(3), pp. 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad021
Hofmann, S. and Raap, U. (2025) ‘Understanding Digital Discretion: A Socio-Technical Perspective on Algorithmic Decision-Making’, Public Management Review, 27(2), pp. 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2299876
Janssen, M. and Kuk, G. (2016) ‘The Challenges and Limits of Big Data Algorithms in Technocratic Governance’, Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), pp. 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011
Janssen, M. et al. (2020) ‘Data-Driven Policy Making: The Need for a New Generation of Policy-Making Tools’, Government Information Quarterly, 37(2), 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101455
Keddell, E. (2019) ‘Algorithmic Justice in Child Protection’, Social Sciences, 8(10), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100281
Lipsky, M. (2010) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th edn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Meijer, A. and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2021) ‘Responsible and Accountable Algorithmization’, Public Administration Review, 81(4), pp. 756–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13381
Mittelstadt, B.D. et al. (2016) ‘The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate’, Big Data & Society, 3(2), pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Peeters, R. (2025) ‘The New Digital State: Algorithmic Governance and the Crisis of Responsibility’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 70(1), pp. 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392241234567
Ranerup, A. and Henriksen, H.Z. (2023) ‘Value Positions in the Pragmatic Use of Automated Decision-Making’, Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101768
Sadin, É. (2020) ‘Artificial Intelligence and the End of Human Deliberation’, AI & Society, 35(2), pp. 321–329.
Tummers, L. and Rocco, P. (2024) ‘Discretion in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’, Public Management Review, 26(3), pp. 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2211556
Veale, M. and Brass, I. (2019) ‘Administration by Algorithm? Public Management Meets Public Sector Machine Learning’, Public Management Review, 21(8), pp. 1193–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1495832
Wirtz, B.W., Weyerer, J.C. and Sturm, B.J. (2026) ‘The Future of AI in Public Administration’, Public Management Review, 28(1), pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2399110
Young, M.M., Bullock, J.B. and Lecy, J.D. (2019) ‘Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Data-Based Decision Making’, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, pp. 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00594-w
Zouridis, S., van Eck, M., Bovens, M. and Schillemans, T. (2020) ‘Algorithmic Accountability in Practice’, Public Administration Review, 80(3), pp. 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13206
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yudithia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










